{"id":5863,"date":"2014-03-14T11:11:46","date_gmt":"2014-03-14T14:41:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.canadacricket.com\/?p=5863"},"modified":"2014-03-14T11:11:46","modified_gmt":"2014-03-14T14:41:46","slug":"what-do-the-icc-proposals-mean-for-the-associates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.canadacricket.com\/?p=5863","title":{"rendered":"What do the ICC proposals mean for the Associates?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tim Wigmore provides a detailed analysis for CricInfo:-<br \/>\n&#8220;The new world order risks entrenching the fundamental inequity in the treatment of the leading Associates and the worst- performing Full Members. Even if Afghanistan defeated Zimbabwe in the Test playoff and in every ODI between the sides, they would still receive around $20 million every eight years &#8211; while Zimbabwe, regardless of performance, would receive over $70 million. There is no sign of how this could ever change: the new ICC plans don&#8217;t even contain a token mention of how any new country could obtain Full Member status.<\/p>\n<p>For all the ICC&#8217;s lofty rhetoric about &#8220;meritocracy&#8221; and expanding the game, a profound funding gap, unrelated to performance, would remain at the heart of international cricket. But it&#8217;s not only Afghanistan and Ireland who should feel aggrieved: the 90 lowest-ranked cricketing nations, who carry with them cricket&#8217;s dreams of becoming a genuinely global game, have cause for profound despair.&#8221;<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.espncricinfo.com\/magazine\/content\/story\/727223.html\">Full story<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tim Wigmore provides a detailed analysis for CricInfo:- &#8220;The new world order risks entrenching the fundamental inequity in the treatment of the leading Associates and the worst- performing Full Members. Even if Afghanistan defeated Zimbabwe in the Test playoff and in every ODI between the sides, they would still receive around $20 million every eight [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7,10],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.canadacricket.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5863"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.canadacricket.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.canadacricket.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.canadacricket.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.canadacricket.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5863"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.canadacricket.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5863\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5864,"href":"https:\/\/www.canadacricket.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5863\/revisions\/5864"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.canadacricket.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5863"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.canadacricket.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5863"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.canadacricket.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5863"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}